NEWS

Relentless questions from the Russian Defence Ministry to Kiev

Relentless questions from the Russian Defence Ministry to Kiev

- What did the Ukrainian Sukhoi want behind the passenger plane of Malaysia? - Why Ukrainians moved antiaircraft units Buk near and then removed them? - Why the fatal airplane declined from its course by 14 km at the behest of Ukrainian air traffic controllers?

by Thanasis Avgerinos

A Ukrainian military aircraft, probably Sukhoi-25, had approached within 5.3 km the Malaysian passenger plane, just before it suddenly lost speed and started to fall!

This was revealed by Russian army chiefs during an extraordinary press conference at the Ministry of Defence of the country.

"We expect an explanation on what the Ukrainian aviation fighter plane was doing" which was recorded by Russian radar with its position remaining there after the disappearance of the Malaysian airplane, reiterated the Director of Central Operations Directorate of the General Staff, Russian lieutenant, Andrei Kartapolof, and chief of the Russian Air Force Igor Makusev.

The Lieutenant also denied as false claims that "there were no other aircraft in the area" implicating even the Americans for lying, as Moscow has documented that from the same region American pilot satellite from 16:06 to 16:21. "We heard from representatives of the U.S. about satellite photos of rocket flying to Malaysian aircraft, but these haven't been seen" said a Russian officer throwing the gauntlet to the American side.

As explained by the two senior officers, Moscow presents data recordings by objective instrument for radar and satellite images, and will provide all relevant information to the experts, who will take over the investigation of the tragedy, wanting to deal with "the large number of contradictory information".

The Russians expressed surprise, because the airplane declined from its normal route to the north by 14 km, entering in this way deeper into the zone of hostilities, controlled mostly by rebels. They wonder what instructions from air traffic controllers were made shortly before the crash to correct this path, despite the lack of time to complete the maneuver.

ameiliktaErotimata2

The Russians don't stop here, as during the press conference satellite images of 3-4 antiaircraft units Buk, which are in the surrounding area of the fall of the Malaysian Boeing Ukrainians military were presented. "We expect answers for what the Buk are needed, as rebels don't have aviation", was mentioned, while they noted the odd movements of at least one of the units of Buk, which in the morning was near the disaster zone of falling, near areas under the control of Russian-speaking militias, while the same evening they were removed.

ameiliktaErotimata3

"These aren't declarations usually used by Americans, British and Australians, but concrete evidence" the military analyst Igor Korotchenko added confirming that the case is still in its start and that Moscow doesn't want to stay out of the conflict.

"It's shameful for a large country with strong intelligence agencies such as the U.S., to base themselves on forgeries of Ukrainians. Serious debate can't and won't be done, despite the promotion of social networks from incompetent Kiev" Korotchenko concluded seeming to know what he's talking about when he says that "we live another representation such as the famous weapons of mass destruction".

Russian officers even ridiculed the "stronger" argument to date from the Ukrainian side, the notorious video with the onboard unit Buk, supposedly leaving towards the Russian border, after it the shot the Malaysian aircraft. Amateur forgers were betrayed by the advertising car that appears in the footage, which showed that the scene is far from the Russian border and even in the city Krasnoarmeisk, which is from May is in the hands of Ukrainian forces. So if someone tries to give us the Buk, from which a "used" rocket is missing, he is none other than the Ukrainian army, which is established in the region.

Journalists in Moscow also remembered another allegation of the preceding days by leading pro-American "star" of the new leadership in Kiev and probably partner of the American CIA, simultaneously director of the notorious Security Service of Ukraine, Valentyn Nalyvaichenko, who had said that the arrested Russian officers, who handled the Buk missile and had the relevant specialty, proved the military identity of one.

The famous arrest of two so important disappeared into the sewer of disinformation, which wants to build developments they can't support. This is the chance for those who want a real investigation of the case and not hastily political, diplomatic and military profits for themselves and their dependents rulers of Kiev.