The pro-Western Russian opposition calls for nuclear strike

In Greece amok literally seizes us, if someone heretical or alternatively thinking mentions something about the name of FYROM or denies the Holy Light of Jerusalem, which to be honest many theologians question for centuries. We also have a comprehensive view on all the sciences and knowledge, even though many experiences teach us that things are rarely as major trends show or how powerful of the world chant in each circumstance. What would we say if one opposition leader asked us imploringly to bomb Turkey, in order for the country to achieve its objectives and to propose the blow to be nuclear? The most suspicious would say this is unthinkable and that such things cannot happen in any country of the world and yet such are the "constructive" proposals, which are uttered by the Russian liberal and pro-Western opposition, who of course have spoken out strongly in favor of Ukrainians nationalists.

But not only, as the fear for Russians opens the way to the expressers of neo-Nazi ideas, who triumphed in the occupied Soviet territories of Ukraine and neighboring Baltic republics during the Second World War. "Things are very simple. Bahrain. The U.S. Fifth Fleet launches a tactical nuclear strike. This takes two seconds. The Russian Black Sea Fleet disappears and at the same time the minds of all are back in place" an analyst, sometime presidential adviser and frequent panelists in Western media, Stanislav Belkovsky, said without blushing. He is a publicist, who ultimately confuses hatred for any Putin and his team with the same hatred for the land which gave him birth.

For anyone who hasn't met such a kind of "intellectual" it's very hard to see through what the Russian society passed for many consecutive years after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, when the West was celebrating for the Russian "democracy" and achievements, while Russia tumbled in deepening economic crisis and political dependence from Boris Yeltsin. Similar tragic witticisms was intellectual and communicative "food", which soaked Russian public for a few decades with school lessons and cultural life of the country in a mass hysteria to convince the Russian population that the utopian aspirations are responsible for all the evils of the world , if not for the original sin.

"Crimea is today undoubtedly under Russian occupation... In fact, I don't renounce that Banderas and Suchevich did everything right and their struggles were vindicated. It's understood that they are national heroes of Ukraine" was said by Oleg Kashin, until recently editor of central financial newspaper "Kommersant", fan of free economy and Western democracy, provided that its caterpillars go through Slavic meat, even if they need to deify their collaborators... "Today every decent resident of Russia must wish for the defeat of his homeland... We strongly support Ukraine, we are in solidarity with the new democratic power and we are convinced that a Russian attack would meet the appropriate armed resistance" was added by the eternally dissident Valeria Novodvorskaya, who now causes the most dislike with the absoluteness of her positions even in much of the "liberal" public Russian society.

It's no coincidence, of course, because the term "liberal" and "democrat" in the post-Soviet Russian society have become offensive, as people in Russia are tired of listening foaming ravings of misanthropy, which represent the utmost exponents of culture and democratic ideals. That's why these views, like many others, are repeated regularly by many Russian media, while cited in the "rough" Russian website "prodotes.net", under the leader of the fascist party of Ukraine Dmitry Yarosh, who supports that if Crimea cannot stay Ukrainian "it's preferable to be Tatar, not Russian". Get Well Europe and your friends...